David Schwartz is a well-known opponent of AI. He constantly reminds people about the possible risks associated with adopting AI-powered tools in contemporary designs. He then made some observations about the practise of utilising AI to deal with court records.
ChatGPT’s answers only look like right ones, Ripple CTO says
an AI-based chatbot Answers from ChatGPT and comparable large language models (LLMs) used in generative AI programmes are false yet unmistakably appear to be genuine. Therefore, they shouldn’t be utilised to discover the truth about “serious” questions.
Schwartz made this comment in response to a study by well-known attorney Steve Vladeck, who holds the Charles Alan Wright Chair in Federal Courts at the University of Texas School of Law. Examples of fake court papers produced using ChatGPT were provided by Vladeck.
The attorney advised against ever conducting legal research utilising ChatGPT or tools of a similar nature. He further requested that phoney court papers not be used to try to teach LLMs.
The risky parallels between papers created by artificial intelligence (AI) and actual documents are what worries Schwartz the most. Even a knowledgeable researcher might be unable to determine which is accurate:
As previously reported by U.Today, amid the first ChatGPT hoopla, Schwartz began voicing worries about the potential risks of AI.
He predicted that soon artificial intelligence (AI) would be able to produce live footage of terrorist events that never took place.
Crypto segment getting tired of AI hype?
Even if the AI fever led to some incredible rallies in low-cap cryptocurrencies that somehow managed to ride the “AI narrative,” not everyone in the cryptocurrency community is enthused about it.
Adam Cochran, a partner at Cinneamhain Ventures and a DeFi analyst, acknowledged that the use of AI in tech marketing techniques for cryptocurrencies in 2023 appears to him as a “red flag”:
It’s possible to oversell the impact of AI on blockchain and cryptocurrency. As we showed in our tutorial, ChatGPT’s responses are too ambiguous and perplexing for crypto research, but AI-generated texts may be useful for learning the fundamentals of writing smart contracts.
For instance, the XRP Ledger’s characteristic appears in-depth and precise, but in reality, it can be deceptive and adds little to our understanding of this blockchain.
